It's been now 23 hours since transfer window closed to eventually open again in January and the majority of fans is yet to get over the fact that we didn't sign two world class midfielders during Summer and got Michael Carrick as the only midfield reinforcement.
First of all, that was David Gill who promised United fans that two world class midfielders would join our team. Sir Alex Ferguson never made such comments, only thing he said before Carrick's arrival was that he was content with squad and would be happy to go into the new season without any new player.
In fact, even this comment caused a lot of fuss and it shouldn't have. What do some fans exactly expect from our manager in such moments? Should he go public and openly say that he is short of options and can't imagine starting new season with no significant strengthening? And what would be the purpose of such act, because it would surely lower team spirit and I can't see any positives coming out from that.
Just put yourself in John O'Shea's of Darren Fletcher's position. They work hard, they give us everything they have, they attend every training and cause absolutely no problem to manager. Moreover, first of them has done very well for us when called upon to play in various areas of the pitch, why has he been constantly slaughtered for that? Some things just can't be understood, there are some people surrounding me who have no clue about supporting their teams and it really concerns me. They expect our manager to blame his players, belittle them by saying to press that they aren't good enough.
Sir Alex Ferguson has received far too much of stick so far, most of them coming from either children who have no clue about his past or gloryhunters who just can't stand that their team isn't as successful as it used to be. They can't get over fact that league is moving forward and understandably rivals are going to cause more problems to United, who led Premiership standard upwards for many years of 90s and 21st century.
Fergie has signed a midfielder in Carrick, he possibly overpaid but who is going to criticise him for that if Carrick turns out to be successful? Sometimes you have to pay over the odds to gather players you want. Was Rooney worth 27 million the day we signed him? Was Ronaldo, unknown 18-year old from Portugal worth 12 million? No, they weren't, but there was no other way to get them and Fergie knew that without this duo, United wouldn't be going into right direction. That's why you should give Carrick time to settle and adjust to United's gamestyle. It should occur quicker than you would think, because he's already played in Premiership.
All this frenzy over ball-winner is understandable to some extent, but it becomes crazy when people say that Fergie screwed up in Mascherano's case, simply because that player couldn't have signed for us. MSI is a business company run by wise people who know that after year of Premiership experience their players could be worth twice of current price, that's why they put them at West Ham and set 90% sell-on clause in their contracts. Would have United agreed for such conditions? Obviously not.
Hargreaves was not for sale either, not due to any brilliance that sticks in him because he clearly isn't a player worth 17 million, but because Bayern didn't want to sell him. They created self-dignity in their minds that didn't allow them to offload their player to United, even though he could be replaced easily for half of money United offered them.
Marcos Senna's deal was a mystery. He was so close to signing for United and then pushed into sideline, because United wanted to bring Hargreaves. Was it because AIG or Glazers forbid United to sign foreigners, or was it because Hargreaves was a more concrete option, we will never find out.
But at the end of the day, Fergie decided not to sign anyone after failure in Hargreaves' pursuit occured. So maybe he's got a different concept, maybe he really thinks that Carrick and Scholes in midfield are enough?
And at top of everything, wouldn't it be more appropriate to judge United's signings and their suitability at the end of the season, when everything will be clear rather than write them off before they have their runs?
Think over United fan, if you ever had a go at Ferguson. You owe him so much that even if you think that he's acting ridiculously in the transfer market, you should trust him and believe that he has his concept of game.
But he clearly hasn't been acting ridiculously in the transfer market. All of our signing throughout the last two years have turned out to be successful, haven't they? If they haven't, then point me out one signing that was pointless? Was it Alan Smith at 6.7 million? Heinze at 6.9 million? Rooney at 27 million? Edwin van der Sar at 2 million? Ji-Sung Park at 4 million? Nemanja Vidic at 7 million? Or maybe Patrice Evra, who seems to have settled well recently, at 5 million? And what I like most about this players is that they all show real desire to play for United, don't moan about sitting on the bench when it's necessary. Generally, I think that all of our current players have loyalty second to none, even Ronaldo who was so keen on a move to Madrid has recently said that United were his dream club. Team spirit is high at the moment and it's heart-warming for me because when I recall 1999 squad, first thing that comes into my mind is that they formed a very special unit, that gave us extra edge over the rest.
Building new United is going into right direction and our squad would be complete with one more defensive midfielder. But there's no rush, he could be signed in January or next year, we're fine with what we have and can get by easily. As long as we play well without him and are going to get a right one in the near future, I'm fine with our transfer activity. It takes some time to gather right players together but at the end of the day it's worthwhile.
Quality over quantity anyday.